Saturday, November 5, 2011

Reach out to your IL Representative and Senator to express your concerns.

Study Warns of Speed Camera Contract Traps

Mayor Rahm Emanuel's red-light speeding camera concept is moving forward. But a report from the Illinois PIRG warns lawmakers to slow down.

The Illinois Senate on Wednesday approved Emanuel's idea to outfit existing red-light cameras in Chicago with speed sensors at intersections near schools and parks. The proposal meant to curb accidents passed 32-24 and now moves to the House.

But an Illinois PIRG report says outsourced speeding enforcement such as the one being considered may not have the public's interests at heart.

"Nationally, automated traffic ticketing tends to be governed by contracts that focus more on profits than safety,” said Celeste Meiffren, Illinois PIRG field director. “That shouldn’t happen.”

The report says contracts between private camera vendors and other municipalities include payment incentives, and others have ticket quotas with potential penalties for cities that don't approve enough tickets.

Meiffren said Illinois and Chicago have implemented protections for the public in these contracts. Still, as the expanded bill is considered, she said the city should be aware of pitfalls that could undermine local officials’ authority.

“Our report found that too many cities wrongly sign away power to ensure the safety of citizens on the roads when they privatize traffic law enforcement," Meiffren said.

She points out Redflex Traffic Systems, the company Chicago has a contract with for 380 red-light cameras, used more than 100 lobbyists to secure contracts in 18 different states, including Illinois.

The report suggests cities avoid incentives for vendors based on volume of tickets, retain public control of traffic policy and put public safety first in the decision.

Emanuel has said this bill is all about public safety. In a Wednesday statement, his office called the Senate vote a "victory for Chicago and Chicago's families."

"It's all about safety and protecting our children and providing safe zones and safe havens for our children," said Ald. Michelle Harris (8th).
BY Lisa Balde // Thursday, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:35 CDT


Source: http://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/ward-room/Study-Warns-Against-Speed-Camers-132709143.html

PIRG - New Report Outlines Problems with Red-Light and Speed Cameras

News Release from 10/27/11

First Nationwide Study Finds 1-in-5 Americans Live Where Traffic Cameras Used; Recommends Ten Safeguards to Protect Municipalities and Drivers

A new research report released today outlines problems with the growing trend among cities to outsource traffic enforcement to red-light and speed camera vendors.

“Too many cities wrongly sign away power to ensure the safety of citizens on the roads when they privatize traffic law enforcement. Automated traffic ticketing tends to be governed by contracts that focus more on profits than safety.” said Phineas Baxandall Ph.D., the Senior Analyst for Tax and Budget Policy at the Public Interest Research Group and a co-author of the report. “That shouldn’t happen,” Baxandall added.

The report, titled Caution: Red Light Cameras Ahead; The Risks of Privatizing Traffic Law Enforcement and How to Protect the Public finds that approximately half of states enable the use of automated traffic law enforcement. Municipalities in these states contract with private companies to operate cameras and issue citations to drivers. Citizens often object to privatized forms of traffic enforcement and many municipalities have found themselves in legal trouble when they attempt to change or update these contracts. Traffic engineering alternatives, such as lengthening yellow lights, are often the best way to reduce injuries from red-light running. However, those solutions often get ignored because of the focus on increasing revenue from tickets.

The nationwide policy study finds that 1-in-5 Americans live in jurisdictions with traffic camera ticketing contracts. It describes which kind of contracts are most problematic for the public: those that create a direct financial incentive to issue more tickets and create penalties that limit the public’s ability to lengthen yellow light intervals or other alternative ways to promote traffic safety.

California is one state that has seen over a hundred cities contracting for automated traffic enforcement and often running into lawsuits and other scandals. According to a statement by California state senator Joe Simitian in reaction to the report, “I believe traffic tickets should be only issued to improve public safety, not to raise revenue. Regrettably, that’s not what happens in some jurisdictions. In too many cases, issues of accuracy, privacy, and due process are taking a back seat to the profit motive. I think we can keep folks safe and still give the driving public a fair shake.”

According to Gary Biller, the Executive Director of the National Motorists Association, “This report is a must-read for city administrators in municipalities considering the addition of red light cameras, for authorities in communities that already have ticket cameras, and for motorists who are subjected to the privatized, for-profit automated traffic enforcement scheme known as red light cameras.”

The report recommends stronger guidelines to ensure that automated traffic enforcement programs focus on improving road safety, rather than ticket revenue. Deals between local governments and traffic camera vendors should:
• Put public safety first in decisions regarding enforcement of traffic laws – this includes evaluating privatized law enforcement camera systems against alternative options without regard to potential revenues.
• Ensure that contract language is free from potential conflicts of interest.
• Avoid direct or indirect incentives for vendors that are based on the volume of tickets or fines.
• Retain public control over traffic policy and engineering decisions, including cancelling contracts if the public is dissatisfied.
• Ensure that the process of contracting with vendors is completely open, with ample opportunity for public participation and each ticket listing where to find online data about automated ticketing for each intersection.

“Some states have a real mess with their red-light camera programs. Other states are now wading into the waters. We’d like to see states that already have camera programs reform them and states considering programs learn from the mistakes of others,” said Ryan Pierannunzi, an associate with U.S. PIRG.

The report can be accessed at this link: http://www.uspirg.org/trafficcamreport

Sunday, August 28, 2011

Watch Out For Speed Cameras As Well

According to Driving University, these locations have Both Red Light & Speed Cameras:
Austin Ave. and Addison St
Irving Park Rd and Austin Ave
Irving Park Rd and Central Ave

The same website also states that the fine at these locations is $90.  All other locations have a fine of $100.  If anyone has received a ticket from these locations and can confirm the lower fine, please leave a comment.

Red Light Camera Location Changes

I admit that it has been a while since I've updated this blog and website, but I was surprised to see that some locations have been deleted. Up until now, the city has just been adding locations. Now it looks like they are taking some down, moving them, and adding more. At first I just thought the city was trying to pull one over on me, but then I remembered warning my parents about the camera at the corner of Irving Park & Western, but then when we passed the intersection, I couldn't see the cameras anywhere. So I confirmed myself that they have been in fact taking down cameras.

There are now 190 camera locations.

These are the intersections that no longer have a camera in place so no need to slam on the brakes at these intersections anymore. The city is quite wise to do this as I didn't even notice that they took the camera down.

Ashland & Roosevelt
Fullerton & Kedzie
Ontario & Kingsbury
State & Roosevelt
Western & Irving Park

These are the newest locations that have been added in the last 12 months:
Clark & Chicago
Illinois & Columbus
Kedzie & 26th
Central & Addison
Kostner & Division
Laramie & Madison

Click here for a list of all the intersections along with maps.

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Website Updated

I got a tip from another concerned resident who informed me of a website that has an up to date list of all the intersections that have red light cameras in the city of Chicago. So I've added all the intersections to my website and mapped them all out.

There are now 187 red light cameras in the city of Chicago. All of the intersections highlighted in yellow are new ones that I added to the map.

As always, if you know of any other intersections, please send me an email.

Monday, February 1, 2010

Confessions of a Chicago Red Light Ticketing Camera

I just received an email with the link below ... some very interesting stuff here about Chicago's Red Light Cameras. Thank you Barnet!

http://www.youtube.com/user/MrBFagel#p/a/u/0/njbG6Yeg3s0

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

New Camera - Irving Park & Elston

I just noticed a new red light camera up on Irving Park and Elston. It isn't listed on the City of Chicago website and there weren't any signs warning you of the photo enforced intersection, but I saw the cameras on Irving Park. It will be added to the map soon.